It is currently November 24th, 2024, 10:41 am

Can a 60 hp E-TEC mount on a 40 E-TEC midsection?

View active topics

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 PostPosted: February 19th, 2016, 4:43 pm   
HPBC PRESIDENT
User avatar

Joined: March 31st, 2012, 5:53 pm
Posts: 3548
Location: Lapping lil charger
How big was that phantom? That was obviously a race class...not the fastest 90hp Etec...that motor on a regular "speed" boat will run over 50,

_________________
08 SRV w/3.1 Hydro-tec Phase lll

I've got enough torque to tear a hole....in time...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: February 19th, 2016, 7:06 pm   
Member
User avatar

Joined: September 15th, 2015, 2:35 pm
Posts: 392
Location: Slough, England UK
well they dont go over 50mph in slow water in the uk or in Europe on average speedboats.

that phantom was an ultra lightweight 16ft, deep v hull with a pad and running a 23 pitch srx/silver streak on a jackplate.
About the last 1ft of the boat and the engine was only thing in the water.

because the e-tec 90 is so slow and people complaining about the sluggishness of it for top end, Brp have a solution.
They make a totally different ,much bigger engine and call that a 90HO !!!!!
check this out
http://www.boattest.com/engine-review/E ... 90-HO_2014

the e-tecs are seriously slow until you get into the big v6 motors, then they come out to play..


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: February 19th, 2016, 7:25 pm   
HPBC PRESIDENT
User avatar

Joined: March 31st, 2012, 5:53 pm
Posts: 3548
Location: Lapping lil charger
Craziness...well no love lost here. Seems funny that our 90hp 4-stroke yamaha will run 45mph on our 1750 Crestliner...and here those BRP people tell us 4strokes are slow lol

_________________
08 SRV w/3.1 Hydro-tec Phase lll

I've got enough torque to tear a hole....in time...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: February 19th, 2016, 8:24 pm   
Team Member
User avatar

Joined: April 1st, 2012, 12:29 am
Posts: 1445
The tuff ran 52-53 if I remember correct...speeds are back on that other site

_________________
Bullet 20 cc Super Comp
Delta with a slow 56
Jcraft with a ProV 150


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: February 19th, 2016, 8:28 pm   
HPBC PRESIDENT
User avatar

Joined: March 31st, 2012, 5:53 pm
Posts: 3548
Location: Lapping lil charger
LittleCharger wrote:
The tuff ran 52-53 if I remember correct...speeds are back on that other site


Figure a 90 might be worth 1 or 2 no??? :mrgreen:

_________________
08 SRV w/3.1 Hydro-tec Phase lll

I've got enough torque to tear a hole....in time...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: February 19th, 2016, 9:31 pm   
Member
User avatar

Joined: September 15th, 2015, 2:35 pm
Posts: 392
Location: Slough, England UK
I expected the 60 e-tec to be much better than it is
Bottom punch is good, plenty of torque, but all down the low end and nothing once it comes into and past midrange.

with its ratio 2.67 to1 (older version) it should easy swing a 13.5x19 prop on a 15ft boat and get to 6,000 rpm.

Maybe BRP only want the pontoon market with this size engine, ?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: February 19th, 2016, 9:33 pm   
Member
User avatar

Joined: September 15th, 2015, 2:35 pm
Posts: 392
Location: Slough, England UK
phillnjack wrote:
I expected the 60 e-tec to be much better than it is
Bottom punch is good, plenty of torque, but all down the low end and nothing once it comes into and past midrange.

with its ratio 2.67 to1 (older version) it should easy swing a 13.5x19 prop on a 15ft boat and get to 6,000 rpm.

Maybe BRP only want the pontoon market with this size engine, ?



4 strokes are not slow here neither, those yams are nice and quick, and very quiet, the buggers creep up on you ha ha


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: February 19th, 2016, 9:42 pm   
Team Member
User avatar

Joined: April 1st, 2012, 12:29 am
Posts: 1445
DoktorC wrote:
LittleCharger wrote:
The tuff ran 52-53 if I remember correct...speeds are back on that other site


Figure a 90 might be worth 1 or 2 no??? :mrgreen:


Maybe the Suzuki is the better option

_________________
Bullet 20 cc Super Comp
Delta with a slow 56
Jcraft with a ProV 150


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: February 20th, 2016, 9:22 am   
Team Member
User avatar

Joined: April 3rd, 2012, 1:52 pm
Posts: 3168
I did some more research.
The new style VooDoo on HWY 11 has a 40 hp E-TEC . No transom lift, no special props. said to run 45 to 50 mph.
In 2012 Mark ran a 40 E-TEC on a production weight full interior Tuff 16...ran 45 mph.
Here is the video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7rSuQAUDtg

On an old style comp VooDoo the motor can sit almost directly on the transom. Even with the high gear ratio there are props that will work. It may not run 60 mph but it has two advantages - it will accelerate faster and big pitch props hold the water in rough conditions. Now I need to find Paul's 1990 red comp VooDoo!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 PostPosted: February 20th, 2016, 9:45 am   
Member

Joined: March 9th, 2014, 3:31 pm
Posts: 70
Here's the deal with the 40-50-60 Etec. The motors use the same block and lower unit. HP is changed through computer mapping. These motors are capable of making 80HP through CPU. The block is the same one used for years on the 45SS engine and carbed production engines. The only real change is the addition of a CPU and fuel injection. I had a 2006 50HP Etec on a 16' Crestliner Sportsman 16 that weighed about 1000 lbs with me in it. Top speed was 46.4 mph with a 21" pitch wheel at about 5800 RPM. You cannot drop pitch and over rev the engine to pick up speed like you can on carbed engines because of the CPU. Now this engine made a ton of torque and the whole shot was the best out of any engine I had ever tried, mercury, yamaha etc. It ran really well. Go talk to your local marine dealer. Most sell every brand of engine these days and will tell you the differences between them. That's what I did. They had every manufacturer on the floor and I was really skeptical at first til I did more research.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hounddog and 44 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Style originally created by Volize © 2003 • Redesigned SkyLine by MartectX © 2008 - 2010